
Case Study: Hiring an Omnichannel Paid + PR Performance Specialist
Client
A global BFSI enterprise (multi-brand, acquisition-led growth) with a centralized marketing function supporting multiple business lines and regions.
The Ask
The client didn’t want a “PPC person.”
They needed an omnichannel performance marketer who could operate across:
- Paid promotions (multi-platform performance)
- LinkedIn marketing (paid + audience strategy + exec-level messaging alignment)
- Curated PR pushes (earned + sponsored amplification)
- Online Reputation Management (ORM) using tools like Cision / Meltwater
…and do it all while working directly with the CMO.
This role sat at the intersection of performance + communications + brand risk, which is why it stayed open.
The Problem
Internally, the role had been open for ~3 months with no confident shortlist.
Two reasons:
- The title was misleading (it sounded like PPC/programmatic, but wasn’t).
- The success criteria were cross-functional and high-stakes (exec-facing, reputation-sensitive, and acquisition-context heavy).
Most candidates were either:
- strong in paid, weak in PR/ORM, or
- strong in PR, weak in performance rigor, or
- too tactical to operate with a CMO.
Our Approach
We treated this like a role calibration problem, not a sourcing problem.
Step 1: Map the role in the marketing ecosystem
We quickly clarified:
- Where this person sits relative to Brand, Corp Comms, Growth, and Regional Marketing
- The decision velocity required (CMO cadence)
- The “failure modes” (brand risk, acquisition messaging inconsistency, wasted spend)
Step 2: Define ROI + measurable outcomes
Instead of vague “omnichannel ownership,” we anchored the role around outcomes like:
- improving efficiency of paid channels while maintaining brand safety
- coordinating amplification around reputation-sensitive narratives
- managing consistency across acquired brands and public perception
- building a repeatable playbook that integrated paid + PR + ORM
Step 3: Build a Hiring Canvas + Search Strategy
We translated the role into:
- functional capability stack (performance + LinkedIn + PR amplification + ORM)
- behavioral profile (CMO-facing, calm under ambiguity, narrative sensitivity, stakeholder gravity)
- ideal target environments (orgs with similar acquisition complexity and reputation surface area)
Step 4: Go-to-market with precision
We mapped organizations with comparable setups and targeted candidates who had already operated in:
- reputation-aware growth environments
- multi-brand / multi-division marketing
- leadership-facing roles where messaging errors have consequences
The Outcome
- We submitted one candidate.
- The candidate moved cleanly through the process.
- The role closed with an offer.
The internal TA team were working the role for months and were quite surprised!
So were we, honestly… but it validated the core point:
When a role is cross functional and high context, calibration beats volume.
Why This Worked
Traditional recruiting techniques fail on roles like this because teams base their search on titles & keywords.
We didn’t.
We searched for:
- the operating pattern
- the stakeholder environment
- the risk + ambiguity tolerance
- the blend of paid + comms maturity
That’s what made 1 submission possible.
If your marketing role has been open for weeks and every shortlist feels “almost right,” you don’t have a sourcing problem, you have a role-definition problem.
We’ll build your Hiring Canvas + search map in one working session, so you stop burning months on the wrong profile.